Critics of media reports on "crack babies" argue that such reports were often:

Media reports on "crack babies" have been criticized for being emotionally driven, often sensationalizing the issue rather than presenting a nuanced and factual analysis. These reports typically prioritize dramatic narratives aimed at capturing public attention, which can lead to misunderstanding and stigma surrounding the affected individuals and families. Such emotional framing tends to overshadow the complex realities of addiction, poverty, and their interrelated social determinants.

By focusing on sensational stories, these reports can perpetuate stereotypes about those struggling with addiction and the children born to mothers who used substances during pregnancy, contributing to a public perception that lacks empathy and understanding of the multifaceted challenges faced by these families. Critics emphasize the need for responsible journalism that conveys factual, research-based information, focusing on systemic issues rather than individual moral failings or simplistic narratives. This reflects a broader concern for promoting awareness and reducing the stigma associated with addiction and its impacts on vulnerable populations.