Which of the following is an evidence-based practice commonly used in addiction social work?

Contingency management and motivational interviewing are both widely recognized as evidence-based practices in the field of addiction social work. Contingency management operates on the principles of behavioral conditioning, where positive behaviors are reinforced with tangible rewards to encourage sobriety and adherence to treatment plans. This approach has shown effectiveness in various settings, particularly when dealing with substance use disorders.

Motivational interviewing, on the other hand, is a client-centered counseling style that aims to enhance an individual’s motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence. This technique is particularly beneficial in addiction treatment, as it helps clients recognize their desire to overcome substance use issues, facilitating their movement toward recovery.

The combination of these two methods effectively addresses the complex motivations and behaviors associated with addiction, making them staples in evidence-based practice for social workers in this field. The other options, while they may have therapeutic benefits, do not have the same level of empirical support specifically relating to addiction treatment as contingency management and motivational interviewing.